On March 16 2008, 4:55 AM, bahamutt99 wrote:You know what struck me as so idiotic about the situation? The dog owner patting his dog on the side and saying "c'mon girl, c'mon girl, let him go." All that dog is thinking is, "daddy's petting me and talking nice! I'm doing good!"
On March 16 2008, 10:35 AM, DemoDick wrote:robc,
A break stick will work, but it's usually not the best option. If you were unable to get your dog to let go then you were doing something incorrect.
If I can choke out a 300 lb man, you can choke a dog off a bite. I don't think it's a good idea to try and give advice on how to do this here, as there is too much that can get lost in translation without a face to face interaction. And there is a risk of injuring the dog's trachea if done incorrectly.
In your situation though (dog won't let go of an object) the best option is to teach him to out.
Demo Dick
Yeah you are right not something to be descibed here......I talked to my brother in law who is a proffesional trainer and is going to show me hoe. He said the break stick is the last resort.....choking is best.....robOn March 16 2008, 3:35 PM, DemoDick wrote:robc,
A break stick will work, but it's usually not the best option. If you were unable to get your dog to let go then you were doing something incorrect.
If I can choke out a 300 lb man, you can choke a dog off a bite. I don't think it's a good idea to try and give advice on how to do this here, as there is too much that can get lost in translation without a face to face interaction. And there is a risk of injuring the dog's trachea if done incorrectly.
In your situation though (dog won't let go of an object) the best option is to teach him to out.
Demo Dick
On March 16 2008, 10:35 AM, DemoDick wrote:robc,
A break stick will work, but it's usually not the best option. If you were unable to get your dog to let go then you were doing something incorrect.
If I can choke out a 300 lb man, you can choke a dog off a bite. I don't think it's a good idea to try and give advice on how to do this here, as there is too much that can get lost in translation without a face to face interaction. And there is a risk of injuring the dog's trachea if done incorrectly.
In your situation though (dog won't let go of an object) the best option is to teach him to out.
Demo Dick
On March 16 2008, 5:55 AM, bahamutt99 wrote:You know what struck me as so idiotic about the situation? The dog owner patting his dog on the side and saying "c'mon girl, c'mon girl, let him go." All that dog is thinking is, "daddy's petting me and talking nice! I'm doing good!"
On March 16 2008, 13:39, airwalk wrote:In a shelter environment, injury of one dog's trachea (I know this sounds harsh) beats having two dogs torn to shreds.
On March 16 2008, bahamutt99 wrote:You know what struck me as so idiotic about the situation? The dog owner patting his dog on the side and saying "c'mon girl, c'mon girl, let him go." All that dog is thinking is, "daddy's petting me and talking nice! I'm doing good!"
On March 16 2008, 15:05, Michele wrote:On March 16 2008, bahamutt99 wrote:You know what struck me as so idiotic about the situation? The dog owner patting his dog on the side and saying "c'mon girl, c'mon girl, let him go." All that dog is thinking is, "daddy's petting me and talking nice! I'm doing good!"
yep. And i really think if the guy had a break stick and knew how to use it, it would not have escalated. Instead of patting his dog, he could of used the break stick and it would of been over. Once the dog let go, he could of picked that dog up. A/C had the other dog already.
On March 16 2008, DemoDick wrote:On March 16 2008, 15:05, Michele wrote:On March 16 2008, bahamutt99 wrote:You know what struck me as so idiotic about the situation? The dog owner patting his dog on the side and saying "c'mon girl, c'mon girl, let him go." All that dog is thinking is, "daddy's petting me and talking nice! I'm doing good!"
yep. And i really think if the guy had a break stick and knew how to use it, it would not have escalated. Instead of patting his dog, he could of used the break stick and it would of been over. Once the dog let go, he could of picked that dog up. A/C had the other dog already.
One of the main points of this thread is that a break stick is not the best way to separate to dogs. Neither man had one, but both had the means to choke the dogs off.
Demo Dick
I respectfully disagree in this particular situation. The one guy had the perfect opportunity to use one and if he did, that fight would of been over quickly.
The A/C guy already had one of the dogs. The other dog, the one the guy was patting on the back and saying: good girl.....if he would of used a break stick on that dog, it would of worked fine.
On March 16 2008, DemoDick wrote:I respectfully disagree in this particular situation. The one guy had the perfect opportunity to use one and if he did, that fight would of been over quickly.
That would depend on one of them carrying an obscure piece of equipment that in many places is presumptive evidence of dog fighting. It is a very bad idea to try to separate dogs that you don't know with a break stick, unless you don't mind one or both dogs letting go and biting you in the hand. Break sticks were originally used by experienced "pro" handlers in the pit on dogs that were of known temperament and behavior and thus very, very unlikely to let go and regrip a hand or arm. I don't want my hands anywhere near a dogs mouth in a fight if I can avoid it. Besides, as I said before, BOTH men had the means to choke the dogs off. The ACO had a snare pole and the other guy had a leash. All they lacked was the know-how.The A/C guy already had one of the dogs. The other dog, the one the guy was patting on the back and saying: good girl.....if he would of used a break stick on that dog, it would of worked fine.
Possibly. It's also possible that he could have gotten bitten. I already addressed this earlier in the thread, but I'll reiterate. Break sticks developed specifically to separate dogs in the pit. It is the only way to get them apart without reducing drive or wearing the dogs out. If you choke a dog out in the pit then you reduce his chances of winning the match. The break stick was developed for a very specific situation that is now illegal. It's outdated and there are much better ways of separating dogs.
Done correctly, choking a dog off will work 100% of the time with minimal risk to dogs and people. It's also more convenient as it can be done with a collar, leash, belt, piece of clothesline, etc.
Demo Dick
On March 16 2008, amazincc wrote:I'm sorry, Michele, but that info - as well as a break stick -would be useless to me if my dog ever got into a fight.
There would be no "gently inserting" anything into his mouth and it would take both of my hands just to hold on to him by the collar.
He tends to do the death shake on his toys, so I can imagine what he would do to another dog... no way would my hands go anywhere near his mouth. He weights about 70 pounds and is pretty damned agile... and fast... as well as VERY strong. He can, and has, knocked me off my feet on a good day while playing ball on a long lead.
I've also seen him "in action" in a fight once (he was a puppy and leashed, the other two dogs weren't)... and there is no way I would want to be right in the middle of that snarling, snapping, wriggling situation...
Have you ever broken up a dog fight that way?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users